Novel notions of current-state anonymity and opacity are analyzed in discrete event systems, implying new security measures against state attacks.
This paper introduces and analyzes novel notions of current-state anonymity and opacity, subject to state attacks, within the context of discrete event systems modeled with nondeterministic finite automata. When a state attack is performed, the intruder learns whether or not the current state of the system falls into a specific subset of states. Thus, state attacks provide additional state information to the intruder during the operation of the system. The system is considered to be current-state anonymous (resp. opaque) under a state attack if the intruder can never be certain that the current state of the system is unique (resp. the current state of the system belongs to a subset of secret states), based on its observations and the additional knowledge provided by any state attacks. A necessary and sufficient condition is presented to check the underlying current-state anonymity (resp. opacity) of a given system subject to a large class of state attacks. We also provide pertinent complexity analysis of the corresponding verification method and illustrative examples that elucidate the proposed concepts of state-attack anonymity (resp. opacity) subject to the specified class of state attacks.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: