Analyzes upper-limb movement characteristics during forehand and backhand volleys in skilled and less-skilled players, indicating significant differences.
Background: In tennis, the volley is an important shot; however, studies describing its movement characteristics have been limited to the forehand volley (FV). In this study, we analyzed the characteristics of upper-limb movement during FV and backhand volley (BV) in skilled and less-skilled tennis players. Methods: Twelve tennis players with experience (skilled group) and eight with little experience (less-skilled group) were included. The participants stood in front of a simulated net and volleyed balls were fed toward the target. Movements were recorded using three video cameras, and three-dimensional coordinates were obtained using the direct linear transformation method. The measured variables were bilateral shoulder rotation angle, pelvic rotation angle, shoulder–pelvis twist angle, and the racket–forearm angle. A two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was conducted with player level (skilled vs. less skilled) and time point (backswing event vs. impact event) as factors. Results: In the FV, a significant main effect of time point was observed for the bilateral shoulder rotation angle (F1,18 = 7.471, p = 0.014, η2 = 0.293). In the BV, significant main effects at both player level and time point were observed for the pelvic rotation (player level; F1,18 = 8.759, p = 0.008, η2 = 0.327, time point; F1,18 = 13.351, p = 0.002, η2 = 0.426). Also, significant main effects at both player level and time point were observed for racket–forearm angles (player level; F1,18 = 6.752, p = 0.018, η2 = 0.273, time point; F1,18 = 10.213, p = 0.005, η2 = 0.362). However, a significant main effect of the player level was observed for the shoulder–pelvis twist angle (F1,18 = 12.124, p = 0.003, η2 = 0.402). Conclusions: In contrast to FV, BV prioritizes ball control by maintaining the shoulder–pelvis angular relationship without releasing the twist. These results suggest that skill-related differences in volleying are more pronounced in the BV than in the FV.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Katsumi et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: