Evaluates long-term outcomes of CC joint preservation for rigid flatfoot, suggesting benefits for patients.
Background: Hindfoot arthrodesis is commonly used to treat rigid flatfoot. While traditionally performed as a triple arthrodesis, recent evidence supports medial double arthrodesis, involving only the talonavicular and talocalcaneal joints and sparing the calcaneocuboid (CC) joint. This study aims to evaluate the long-term condition of the spared CC joint more than 10 years after double arthrodesis. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 17 feet in 13 patients (8 women, 5 men; mean age 43.8 ± 16.5 years) who underwent double arthrodesis for rigid flatfoot. Clinical outcomes were assessed using the AOFAS score and a visual analog pain scale. Radiographic evaluation of the CC joint was based on Graves’ four-stage classification, preoperatively and at final follow-up (minimum 10 years). Results: The mean follow-up was 154.6 ± 20.4 months. No patient required additional CC arthrodesis, and all CC joints remained asymptomatic. Radiographically, degeneration improved in 9 cases, was stable in 6, and worsened in 2. The mean AOFAS score significantly improved from 23.7 ± 9.3 preoperatively to 70.1 ± 9.3 at the longest follow-up (p < 0.0001). Similarly, the mean VAS pain score decreased from 6.4 ± 1.3 preoperatively to 2.1 ± 1.2 at follow-up (p < 0.0001). Conclusions: Double medial arthrodesis spares the CC joint, enabling arthrodiastasis and subchondral remodeling over time. This contributes to long-term pain relief and improved radiographic outcomes. Preserving minimal motion at the CC joint may enhance foot adaptability to uneven terrain and reduce the need for further surgical intervention.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Laurent et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: