Key result
CT perfusion overestimates infarct core in up to ~58% of patients imaged within six hours.
Why the study?
Ghost infarct core describes CT perfusion core overestimation in large vessel occlusions, but its frequency, magnitude, and associated variables required systematic review.
Does CT perfusion imaging overestimate ischemic core (Ghost infarct core) in patients with large vessel occlusions?
Systematic Review
Does CT perfusion imaging overestimate ischemic core (Ghost infarct core) in patients with large vessel occlusions?
CT perfusion frequently overestimates ischemic core in acute stroke patients with poor collaterals, highlighting the need for cautious interpretation to avoid inappropriately withholding reperfusion therapy.
Cautious CT perfusion interpretation is warranted in early-window LVO to avoid excluding reperfusion candidates; confirms overestimation frequency across studies.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: CT perfusion (CTP) imaging is now widely used to select patients with large vessel occlusions for mechanical thrombectomy. Ghost infarct core (GIC) phenomenon has been coined to describe CTP core overestimation and has been investigated in several retrospective studies. Our aim is to review the frequency, magnitude, and variables associated with this phenomenon. METHODS: A primary literature search resulted in eight studies documenting median time from symptom onset to CTP, median estimated core size, median final infarct volume, median core overestimation of the GIC population, recanalization rates, good outcomes, and collateral status for this systematic review. RESULTS: All the studies investigated patients who underwent CTP within 6 hours of symptom onset, ranging from median times of 105 to 309 minutes. The frequency of core overestimation varied from 6% to 58.4%, while the median estimated ischemic core and final infarction volume ranged from 7 to 27 mL and 12 to 31 mL, respectively. The median core overestimation ranged from 3.6 to 30 mL with upper quartile ranges up to 58 mL. GIC was found to be a highly time-and-collateral-dependent process that increases in frequency and magnitude as the time from symptom onset to imaging decreases and in the presence of poor collaterals. CONCLUSIONS: CTP ischemic core overestimation appears to be a relatively common phenomenon that is most frequent in patients with poor collaterals imaged within the acute time window. Early perfusion imaging should be interpreted with caution to prevent the inadvertent exclusion of patients from highly effective reperfusion therapies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ballout et al. (2023) conducted a systematic review in Large vessel occlusion. CT perfusion imaging was evaluated on Frequency and magnitude of CT perfusion core overestimation. CT perfusion core overestimation occurred in 6% to 58.4% of patients imaged within 6 hours of symptom onset, with median overestimations ranging from 3.6 to 30 mL.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: