Key result
Serelaxin reduces LV fibrosis and restores function better than perindopril in preclinical models.
Why the study?
Because serelaxin's anti-fibrotic effects may be antagonized by angiotensin receptor blockers, this study determined whether it is a suitable adjunct therapy to angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors.
Does serelaxin reduce LV fibrosis and improve LV function compared to or combined with perindopril in murine models of heart disease?
Does serelaxin reduce LV fibrosis and improve LV function compared to or combined with perindopril in murine models of heart disease?
Serelaxin has greater anti-fibrotic potential than perindopril and can be effectively co-administered with ACE inhibitors in preclinical models of heart disease.
Supports exploration of serelaxin for cardiac fibrosis; leaves open translation and superiority versus perindopril in humans.
AIMS: Serelaxin (RLX), the drug form of human gene-2 relaxin, has potent anti-fibrotic properties that are currently being clinically-evaluated for the treatment of heart failure (HF). Whilst these effects can potentially be antagonised by angiotensin receptor blocker co-administration, this study determined if RLX was a suitable adjunct therapy to angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEi) treatment. In particular, the anti-fibrotic effects of RLX were compared to or combined with the clinically-used ACEi, perindopril, in murine models of isoprenaline (ISO)-induced cardiomyopathy and surgically-induced myocardial infarction (MI). METHODS: The dose-response effects of perindopril (1, 2 or 4 mg/kg/day) on systolic blood pressure (SBP) and left ventricular (LV) fibrosis were first assessed in ISO-injured mice, after 7- or 14-days of treatment. The therapeutic effects of RLX (0.5 mg/kg/day) on SBP, LV fibrosis and LV functional parameters (ejection fraction, fractional shortening, stroke volume, cardiac output) were then compared to or combined with perindopril (2 mg/kg/day) pre-treatment (7-days prior) or co-administration (over 7-days) in ISO-injured mice; or perindopril co-administration (over 21-days) in MI-injured mice. KEY FINDINGS: Perindopril attenuated the ISO-induced LV fibrosis at 2 or 4 mg/kg/day, but induced significant hypotension at 4 mg/kg/day. RLX reduced the ISO- or MI-induced LV fibrosis, and restored measures of LV dysfunction, to a greater extent than perindopril (2 mg/kg/day), in the absence of BP regulation. These effects were maintained in the presence of perindopril pre-treatment or co-administration. SIGNIFICANCE: These findings confirmed that RLX had greater anti-fibrotic potential than perindopril, but could be applied as a rapidly-acting adjunct therapy to ACEi.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2026) studied Heart failure / cardiomyopathy / myocardial infarction. Serelaxin (RLX) vs. Perindopril (2 mg/kg/day) was evaluated on Systolic blood pressure (SBP), left ventricular (LV) fibrosis, and LV functional parameters. Serelaxin reduced ISO- or MI-induced LV fibrosis and restored measures of LV dysfunction to a greater extent than perindopril, and these effects were maintained when co-administered.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: