Critical intellectuals were traditionally those who utilized their skills of speaking and writing to denounce injustices and abuses of power, and to fight for truth, justice, progress, and other positive values. In the words of Jean-Paul Sartre (1974: 285), the duty of the intellectual is to denounce injustice wherever it occurs. The modern critical intellectuals field of action was what Habermas (1989) called the public sphere of democratic debate, political dialogue, and the writing and discussion of newspapers, journals, pamphlets, and books. Of course, not all intellectuals were critical or by any means progressive. With the rise of modern societies, there was a division between physical and mental labor, and intellectuals became those who specialized in mental labor, producing and distributing ideas and culture, with some opposing and some legitimating the established forms of society. Thus, intellectuals were split into those critical and oppositional individuals who opposed injustice and oppression, as contrasted to those producers of ideology who legitimated the forms of class, race, and gender domination and inequality in modern societies. In the following reflections, I want to discuss some challenges from postmodern theory to the classical conceptions of the critical intellectual and some of the ways that new technologies and new
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Douglas Kellner (Sat,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a129ba145487b7639a6d481 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/016344395017003005
Douglas Kellner
University of California, Los Angeles
Media Culture & Society
The University of Texas at Austin
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...