Key result
Counteracting respiration-induced cycles of carotid blood pressure using neck suction significantly decreased respiratory sinus arrhythmia from 2136 to 1372 ms2 (P<0.01).
Why the study?
Does sinusoidal neck suction influence respiratory sinus arrhythmia in healthy humans?
Population
Healthy conscious humans
Comparison
Sinusoidal neck suction during controlled… vs Suction of a non-baroreceptor area or baseline
Design
Other
Authors
Loading...
Neck suction blunts RSA in healthy humans; supports baroreflex contribution but leaves open relevance to disease or therapy.
Does sinusoidal neck suction influence respiratory sinus arrhythmia in healthy humans?
Absolute Event Rate: 1372% vs 2136%
p-value: p=<.01
Respiratory sinus arrhythmia in conscious humans is significantly influenced by arterial baroreceptors responding to respiratory changes in blood pressure.
Piepoli et al. (1997) studied Healthy (n=13). Sinusoidal neck suction vs. Suction of a non-baroreceptor area (the thigh) was evaluated on Respiratory sinus arrhythmia (spectral analysis of RR interval) (p=<.01). Counteracting respiration-induced cycles of carotid blood pressure using neck suction significantly decreased respiratory sinus arrhythmia from 2136 to 1372 ms2 (P<0.01).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: