Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
January 1, 2001BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology

A randomised controlled trial of epidural compared with non‐epidural analgesia in labour

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

CHC. HowellQueen Elizabeth HospitalCKCeleste KiddUniversity of California, BerkeleyWRW. RobertsJackson Memorial Hospital

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Implication

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Cite This Study

Howell et al. (2001) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a129cf34891eb3ecca3fab9https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2001.00012.x
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1CONTINUOUS LUMBAR EPIDURAL ANALGESIA USING BUPIVICAINE: A STUDY OF THE FETUS AND NEWBORN CHILD1971 · 37 citations
  2. 2Maternal opinion about analgesia for labour1980 · 98 citations
  3. 3Lack of analgesic effect of systemically administered morphine or pethidine on labour pain1996 · 202 citations
  4. 4Randomized trial of epidural versus intravenous analgesia during labor1995 · 320 citations