Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Meta-analytic techniques were used to synthesize findings from the extant empirical literature on gender and social class as predictors of subjective well-being among U.S. adults. Based upon Rubin's (1979) research, we tested a family of hypotheses that gender, relative to social class, accounted for more variation in subjective well-being. Examination of zero-order and first-order effect sizes revealed that men have slightly higher subjective well-being than women and that, while gender is a statistically significant predictor of subjective well-being, it accounts for little variance. Three measures of social class, composite socioeconomic status, occupational status, and income also are significantly related to subjective well-being on the zero-order level; but that relation is reduced when gender is used as a covariate. Overall, across the studies we synthesized, gender does not transcend social class as a major determinant of subjective well-being.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Haring et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a129f1592637892a9a6ee19 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/001872678403700805
Marilyn J. Haring
Arizona State University
William A. Stock
Northern Illinois University
Morris A. Okun
Arizona State University
Human Relations
Arizona State University
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: