Key result
A historical and conceptual review of iatrogenic neurologic complications provides a framework for understanding medically related harms and offers strategies to reduce such injuries.
This review places iatrogenic neurologic complications within a larger historical and conceptual framework and provides suggestions for limiting such injuries.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Hypothesis-generating for reducing iatrogenic neurologic harms; extends prior literature with a unifying conceptual framework.
Neurologic illness relating to health care delivery has been increasingly described since the 1960's, primarily in the general medical literature. Iatrogenic neurologic complications have either been defined generically in terms of consequences of particular therapeutic or diagnostic approaches, or have been delineated with reference to more specific and serious complications such as intracerebral hemorrhage. In these reports, little attempt has been made to situate iatrogenic neurologic complications, either historically or conceptually, within the larger framework of medically related harms. Moreover, in this literature, few suggestions have been provided with regard to strategies to reduce such complications. The objective of the present review is to place the problem of iatrogenic neurologic complications within a larger historical and conceptual framework, as well as to provide suggestions for limiting such injuries.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Alan I. Faden (1998) conducted a review in Iatrogenic neurologic complications. A historical and conceptual review of iatrogenic neurologic complications provides a framework for understanding medically related harms and offers strategies to reduce such injuries.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: