Key result
Catheter ablation of non-septal atypical atrial tachycardias achieved a significantly higher acute success rate compared to septal atrial tachycardias (97% vs 77%, P=0.0023).
Why the study?
Does the isthmus location (septal vs non-septal) impact the acute and long-term success of catheter ablation in patients with atypical atrial flutter?
Cohort (n=91)
Yes
Does the isthmus location (septal vs non-septal) impact the acute and long-term success of catheter ablation in patients with atypical atrial flutter?
Catheter ablation of atypical atrial flutter using high-density activation and entrainment mapping is highly successful, though septal ATs are associated with lower acute success rates.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May warrant procedural caution for septal atypical ATs; this cohort study leaves open randomized confirmation of long-term outcomes.
AIMS: The aim of the study was to assess the impact of isthmus location of atypical atrial flutters/atrial tachycardias (ATs) on outcomes of catheter ablation. Atrial tachycardias are clinically challenging arrhythmias that can occur in the presence of atrial scar--often due to either cardiac surgery or prior ablation for atrial fibrillation. We previously demonstrated a catheter ablation approach employing rapid multielectrode activation mapping with targeted entrainment manoeuvrs. However, the role that AT isthmus location plays in acute and long-term success of ablation remains uncertain. METHODS AND RESULTS: Retrospective multicenter analysis of 91 consecutive AT patients undergoing ablation using a systematic four-step approach: (i) high-density activation mapping; (ii) analysis of atrial activation to identify wavefronts of electrical propagation; (iii) targeted entrainment of putative channels; and (iv) irrigated radiofrequency ablation of constrained regions of the circuit. Clinical outcomes, procedural details, and clinical profiles were determined. A total of 171 ATs (1.9 ± 1.0 per patient, 26% septal ATs) were targeted for ablation. The acute success rates were 97 and 77% for patients with either non-septal ATs or septal ATs, respectively (P = 0.0023). Similarly, the long-term success rates were 82 and 67% for patients with either no septal ATs or at least one septal AT, respectively (P = 0.1057). The long-term success rates were 75, 88, and 57% for patients with ATs associated with prior catheter ablation, cardiac surgery or MAZE, and idiopathic atrial scar, respectively. CONCLUSION: Catheter ablation of AT can be successfully performed employing a strategy of combined high-density activation and entrainment mapping. Septal ATs are associated with higher rates of acute and long-term recurrences.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Coffey et al. (2013) conducted a cohort in Atypical atrial flutter / atrial tachycardia (n=91). Catheter ablation using a systematic four-step mapping approach vs. Septal vs non-septal AT location was evaluated on Acute success rate (p=0.0023). Catheter ablation of non-septal atypical atrial tachycardias achieved a significantly higher acute success rate compared to septal atrial tachycardias (97% vs 77%, P=0.0023).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: