Key result
Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging based on the Lake Louise Criteria demonstrated moderate diagnostic accuracy (67%), sensitivity (69%), and specificity (56%) for myocarditis compared to endomyocardial biopsy.
Why the study?
What is the diagnostic performance of cardiac magnetic resonance and therapeutic value of immunosuppressive therapy in patients with myocarditis heart failure?
Meta-Analysis (n=474)
What is the diagnostic performance of cardiac magnetic resonance and therapeutic value of immunosuppressive therapy in patients with myocarditis heart failure?
This review summarizes the clinical status, diagnostic performance of cardiac magnetic resonance, and therapeutic value of immunosuppressive therapy in myocarditis heart failure.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Moderate CMR accuracy versus biopsy warrants diagnostic caution in myocarditis; leaves open refined noninvasive criteria for heart failure.
Myocarditis heart failure or inflammatory cardiomyopathy is a polymorphic disease complicated by heterogeneous clinical presentation and evolution. Patients with myocarditis presenting with severe left ventricular (LV) dysfunction and life-threatening arrhythmias represent a demanding challenge to clinicians. Although molecular evaluation of the myocardium using endomyocardial biopsy and modern techniques of cardiovascular imaging provide valuable insights into its etiology and pathophysiology, diagnosis remains a clinical challenge because of varied modes of clinical presentation, diversity of approaches to diagnosis, a spectrum of clinical courses and unsettled perspective on therapeutics in different patient settings and viral pathologies. This review seeks to frame recent clinical advances in diagnosing and managing myocarditis HF within the latest understanding of clinical presentation, etiology and pathophysiology obtained from experimental animal models and clinical trials. The objective is to improve understanding of the clinical status of myocarditis heart failure.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Aref Albakri (2018) conducted a meta-analysis in Clinically suspected myocarditis or inflammatory dilated cardiomyopathy (n=474). Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging (Lake Louise Criteria) vs. Endomyocardial biopsy (EMB) was evaluated on Diagnostic accuracy of Lake Louise Criteria (LLC). Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging based on the Lake Louise Criteria demonstrated moderate diagnostic accuracy (67%), sensitivity (69%), and specificity (56%) for myocarditis compared to endomyocardial biopsy.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: