Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This paper investigates the effects of post-purchase reinforcement and choice-inconsistent information, the latter of which arouses cognitive dissonance, on consumer satisfaction and perceived service quality (SQ). A field experiment was conducted in which university students are provided with university rankings information that is either consistent with their choice of university (choice-reinforcing) or inconsistent with their choice. It is found that provision of choice-inconsistent information affects neither satisfaction nor perceived SQ. In contrast, while not affecting perceived SQ, provision of post-purchase reinforcement does enhance satisfaction. The paper demonstrates this to result from a reduction in psychological discomfort regarding the choice made, which is the emotional aspect of cognitive dissonance. The paper also finds that both information conditions result in an increase in Word-of-Mouth behaviour compared to a control group. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mao et al. (2009) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: