Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
BACKGROUND: F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) in patients with breast cancer (BC) receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) according to tumor subtypes and PET timing. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eighty-six consecutive patients with stage II/III BC who received PET/CT during or following NAC were included. Time-dependent receiver operating characteristic analysis and Kaplan-Meier analysis were used to determine correlation between metabolic parameters and survival outcomes. RESULTS: with survival was obtained on PET after two to three cycles of NAC (area under the curve [AUC]: 0.941 at 1 year after initiation of NAC) and PET after four to five (AUC: 0.871 at 4 years), while PET after six to eight cycles of NAC had less prognostic value. CMR was obtained in 62% of patients (23/37) with estrogen receptor-positive (ER+)/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) BC, in 48% (12/25) triple-negative BC (TNBC), and in 75% (18/24) HER2-positive (HER2+) tumors. Patients with CMR on an early-mid PET had 5-year OS rates of 92% for ER+/HER2- tumors and 80% for TNBC, respectively. Among HER2+ subtype, 89% patients (16/18) with CMR had no relapse. CONCLUSION: F-fluorodeoxyglucose emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) during neoadjuvant chemotherapy, especially for hormone receptor-positive tumors and triple negative BC. Moreover, PET/CT performed during an early- or mid-course neoadjuvant therapy is more predictive for long-term survival outcome than a late PET/CT. These findings support that CMR may serve as a favorable imaging prognosticator for BC and has potential for application to daily clinical practice.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chen et al. (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: