Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Low-skill workers are comparatively immobile. This paper estimates the role of housing prices and social transfers in accounting for this fact using a spatial equilibrium model. Reduced-form estimates using US census data show that positive local labor demand shocks increase population more than negative shocks reduce population, that this asymmetry is larger for low-skill workers, and that such an asymmetry is absent for average wages, housing values, and rental prices. Generalized method of moments estimates reveal that the comparative immobility of low-skill workers is due not to higher mobility costs but to a lower incidence of adverse labor demand shocks.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Matthew Notowidigdo (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: