Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Erentaitė, R., Bergman, L. R. & Žukauskienė, R. (2012). Cross‐contextual stability of bullying victimization: A person‐oriented analysis of cyber and traditional bullying experiences among adolescents. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology 53, 181–190. Using a person‐oriented approach the study examined whether bullying victimization at school continued into cyberspace victimization in a large sample of high school students in Lithuania ( N = 1667, 58% girls), age 15–19 ( M = 17.29, SD = 0.95). Three forms of traditional bullying (verbal, physical and relational) and seven forms of cyberbullying victimization through cell phones and computers were included in the analysis. The findings revealed that 35% of traditional bullying victims were also bullied in cyberspace. In particular, adolescents who experienced predominantly verbal and relational bullying at school, showed a higher risk of victimization in cyberspace a year later, while this was not observed for predominantly physical forms of traditional bullying. The findings point to the importance of a cross‐contextual perspective in studies on stability of bullying victimization.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Erentaitė et al. (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: