Key result
CTO-PCI cuts cardiac death ~45% vs. optimal medical therapy in older adults.
Why the study?
Managing coronary chronic total occlusion in older adults remains challenging due to a scarcity of evidence.
Does attempted or successful CTO-PCI improve quality of life and cardiovascular outcomes compared with optimal medical therapy or failed CTO-PCI in older adults with chronic total occlusion?
Meta-Analysis (n=19,282)
Does attempted or successful CTO-PCI improve quality of life and cardiovascular outcomes compared with optimal medical therapy or failed CTO-PCI in older adults with chronic total occlusion?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Attempted or successful CTO-PCI may be associated with reduced all-cause mortality, cardiac death, MACE, and improved quality of life compared with optimal medical therapy in older adults, though these findings are primarily hypothesis-generating due to their reliance on observational data.
BACKGROUND: Managing coronary chronic total occlusion (CTO) in older adults remains challenging due to a scarcity of evidence. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to assess the association of attempted/successful CTO percutaneous coronary intervention (CTO-PCI) with quality of life (QoL) measures, all-cause mortality, and cardiovascular outcomes in studies that adequately represented older adults. METHODS: A systematic search of 6 databases was performed to identify randomized trials and observational studies comparing CTO-PCI with optimal medical therapy (OMT) in adults, with particular inclusion of studies adequately representing older individuals. Meta-regression analyses were conducted to estimate relative risks (RRs) for key outcomes. RESULTS: A total 29 studies encompassing 19,282 patients were included, of which 28 were observational. Compared with OMT, attempted CTO-PCI was significantly associated with reductions in cardiac death (RR: 0.55; 95% CI: 0.40-0.76), all-cause mortality (RR: 0.61; 95% CI: 0.50-0.75), and major adverse cardiovascular events (RR: 0.68; 95% CI: 0.60-0.78). Rates of myocardial infarction and revascularization were similar between groups. In analyses comparing successful vs failed CTO-PCI, only cardiac death and all-cause mortality were reduced. In addition, among the 4 studies that evaluated QoL, attempted/successful CTO-PCI yielded greater improvements than OMT/failed PCI. Evidence for the above results were derived from observational studies and remained less certain. CONCLUSIONS: In older adults, attempted or successful CTO-PCI may be associated with improved QoL and favorable cardiovascular outcomes compared with OMT; however, as these findings are largely derived from observational studies, they should be viewed as hypothesis-generating. Randomized trials in representative older populations are needed to confirm these associations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jamil et al. (2025) conducted a meta-analysis in Chronic Total Occlusion (n=19,282). Attempted percutaneous coronary intervention (CTO-PCI) vs. Optimal medical therapy (OMT) was evaluated on Cardiac death (RR 0.55, 95% CI 0.40-0.76). Attempted percutaneous coronary intervention for chronic total occlusion reduced cardiac death by 45% (RR 0.55) compared to optimal medical therapy in populations representing older adults.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: