Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
How might religious discourse about powerlessness motivate practical strategies for gaining power? To answer this question, I analyze two events in Fiji, both explicitly violent and markedly Christian: the story of a murder committed by a man who wanted to become a Methodist minister and a threat of cannibalism by men who supported a coup d'état that was justified with reference to Fiji as a Christian nation. These events are best seen as responses to a common theme in indigenous Fijian religious discourse: the loss of mana (efficacy). This theme motivates the “interconversion” of these events between poles of intelligibility and palpability: palpable actions are transformed into intelligible products such as narratives; conversely, intelligible products are enacted. The cases of “good Christian” murder and cannibalism, I argue, reveal the transformative dynamics of religious discourse and suggest how claims about the loss of efficacy can be practically effective.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Matt Tomlinson (2007) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: