Key result
Transfemoral aortic valve replacement in patients with severe aortic stenosis significantly improved intra-ventricular mechanical dyssynchrony compared to baseline.
Why the study?
AS imposes significant LV afterload with non-uniform regional load manifestations leading to mechanical dyssynchrony, prompting evaluation of dyssynchrony prevalence and changes after transfemoral TAVR.
Does TAVR improve mechanical dyssynchrony in patients with severe aortic stenosis?
Observational (n=225)
Does TAVR improve mechanical dyssynchrony in patients with severe aortic stenosis?
TAVR significantly improves intra-ventricular mechanical dyssynchrony in patients with severe aortic stenosis.
Supports dyssynchrony assessment as TAVR outcome marker in severe AS; leaves open clinical implications pending randomized data.
INTRODUCTION: Aortic stenosis (AS) imposes a significant afterload on the left ventricle, but regional manifestations of the overall load may not be uniform, leading to mechanical dyssynchrony. Accordingly, we evaluated the prevalence of dyssynchrony in patients with severe AS at baseline as well as changes after transfemoral aortic valve replacement (TAVR). METHODS: This study is a retrospective analysis of 225 patients in sinus rhythm who underwent TAVR for severe AS, in whom inter-ventricular and intra-ventricular dyssynchrony were measured at baseline, discharge, 1 month, and 1 year. Inter-ventricular dyssynchrony was defined as the difference between left and right ventricular pre-ejection intervals; intra-ventricular dyssynchrony was defined as the difference between time to peak systolic velocity of the basal septal and lateral segments. Patients were further stratified into those with QRS <120 ms or >120 ms. RESULTS: At baseline, a quarter of patients met the criterion for significant inter-ventricular dyssynchrony, and a third had evidence of intra-ventricular dyssynchrony. Both decreased after TAVR although only the intra-ventricular dyssynchrony reached statistical significance. The interplay between QRS duration and changes in inter- and intra-ventricular dyssynchrony are also explored. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with severe AS, there was evidence of mechanical dyssynchrony that is improved post-TAVR. Whether dyssynchrony is clinically and prognostically significant, and if it represents a potential target for additional therapy remains to be studied.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Truong et al. (2019) conducted an observational in Severe aortic stenosis (n=225). Transfemoral aortic valve replacement (TAVR) vs. Baseline (pre-TAVR) was evaluated on Changes in inter-ventricular and intra-ventricular dyssynchrony. Transfemoral aortic valve replacement in patients with severe aortic stenosis significantly improved intra-ventricular mechanical dyssynchrony compared to baseline.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: