Key result
Aortic valve replacement for severe aortic stenosis significantly improved left ventricular function, increasing systolic mitral annular velocity from 8.07 cm/s to 10.09 cm/s.
Why the study?
Does aortic valve replacement improve left ventricular function assessed by tissue Doppler imaging in patients with severe aortic stenosis?
Observational (n=23)
No
Does aortic valve replacement improve left ventricular function assessed by tissue Doppler imaging in patients with severe aortic stenosis?
Absolute Event Rate: 10.09% vs 8.07%
p-value: p=0.004
Tissue Doppler imaging detects significant improvements in left ventricular systolic and diastolic function after aortic valve replacement for severe aortic stenosis, with greater improvements seen in isolated AVR compared to concomitant AVR with CABG.
May aid LV recovery assessment by tissue Doppler post-AVR; leaves open outcome impact and needs prospective trials.
INTRODUCTION: The effects of reduction of left ventricular (LV) systemic afterload following aortic valve replacement (AVR) for severe aortic valve stenosis (AS) were investigated, using echocardiography and tissue Doppler imaging (TDI). METHODS: We compared the preoperative and postoperative echocardiographic assessments of 23 patients with severe AS who had undergone isolated AVR (n = 13) or concomitant AVR with coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) (n = 10). Conventional echocardiographic evaluations and TDI at the lateral mitral annulus were performed. RESULTS: Echocardiography was performed at a median of 120 (interquartile range: 66-141) days after AVR. There was significant reduction in aortic transvalvular mean pressure gradient after AVR. Although LV dimensions, mass and ejection fraction remained unchanged, LV diastolic and systolic functions improved (as observed on TDI). Early diastolic (E'), late diastolic (A') and systolic (S') mitral annular velocities increased significantly (p < 0.05). There was significant improvement in TDI-derived parameters among the patients who had isolated AVR, while among the patients who had concomitant AVR with CABG, only S' had significant improvement (p = 0.028). CONCLUSION: TDI was able to detect improvements in LV systolic and diastolic function after AVR for severe AS. There was less improvement in the TDI-derived diastolic parameters among patients who underwent concomitant AVR with CABG than among patients who underwent isolated AVR.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nieh et al. (2015) conducted an observational in Severe aortic stenosis (n=23). Aortic valve replacement vs. Preoperative baseline was evaluated on Systolic mitral annular velocity (S') in cm/s (p=0.004). Aortic valve replacement for severe aortic stenosis significantly improved left ventricular function, increasing systolic mitral annular velocity from 8.07 cm/s to 10.09 cm/s.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: