Why the study?
Aortic valve replacement relieves chronic left ventricular pressure overload in aortic stenosis, and the extent of early postoperative ventricular recovery remains clinically important.
Does isolated surgical aortic valve replacement improve left ventricular systolic function, left ventricular mass index, and functional status in the early postoperative period in adult patients with aortic stenosis?
Observational (n=40)
No
Does isolated surgical aortic valve replacement improve left ventricular systolic function, left ventricular mass index, and functional status in the early postoperative period in adult patients with aortic stenosis?
Surgical aortic valve replacement in patients with aortic stenosis results in significant early improvements in LVEF, regression of LV mass index, reduction in transvalvular gradient, and better NYHA functional class within four weeks postoperatively.
Early post-AVR LV changes in AS need prospective validation; leaves open their prognostic role in observational cohorts.
Background: Aortic stenosis (AS) causes chronic left ventricular pressure overload, resulting in ventricular hypertrophy, remodeling and progressive impairment of ventricular function. Aortic valve replacement (AVR) relieves the pressure overload, but the extent of early ventricular recovery remains clinically important. This study evaluated early changes in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), left ventricular mass (LVM), left ventricular mass index (LVMI), relative wall thickness (RWT), hemodynamic parameters and functional status following surgical AVR. Methods: This prospective observational study included 40 adult patients with AS who underwent isolated surgical AVR at the National Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases and Hospital, Dhaka, Bangladesh, from July 2017 to June 2018. Preoperative and early postoperative echocardiographic parameters were compared. Clinical outcomes included NYHA functional class, aortic valve pressure gradient, ICU stay and postoperative complications. Results: The mean age was 39.23±12.41 years; 25 (62.5%) patients were male and 15 (37.5%) were female. Mean LVEF increased significantly from 46.30±7.07% preoperatively to 50.83±6.06% postoperatively (p=0.001). Mean LVM decreased from 407.92±157.05 g to 304.49±132.73 g (p=0.001), while LVMI decreased from 220.32±102.58 to 160.57±86.94 (p=0.001). The mean aortic valve pressure gradient decreased from 54.59±4.41 to 12.37±6.60 mmHg (p<0.0001). NYHA functional class improved from 2.83±0.38 to 1.07±0.25 (p<0.001). RWT decreased from 0.4738±0.074 to 0.4227±0.086 (p<0.003). One patient (2.5%) developed prosthesis-patient mismatch and one (2.5%) developed paravalvular leakage. Two deaths were reported during the study period. Conclusions: Surgical AVR was associated with significant early improvement in left ventricular systolic function, regression of left ventricular mass and LVMI, reduction in transvalvular pressure gradient, and improvement in functional status within four weeks. These findings suggest that relief of aortic obstruction is associated with early favorable ventricular remodeling in patients with AS.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jamil et al. (2026) conducted an observational in Aortic stenosis (n=40). Isolated surgical aortic valve replacement (AVR) vs. Preoperative baseline was evaluated on Early changes in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and left ventricular mass index (LVMI) (p=0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: