Why the study?
Does aortic valve replacement improve long-axis left ventricular function in patients with severe aortic stenosis and preserved LV ejection fraction?
Does aortic valve replacement improve long-axis left ventricular function in patients with severe aortic stenosis and preserved LV ejection fraction?
Aortic valve replacement significantly improves long-axis left ventricular function in patients with severe aortic stenosis and preserved ejection fraction.
Suggests long-axis LV recovery after AVR in preserved-EF AS; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation.
BACKGROUND: Patients with aortic stenosis (AS) should undergo aortic valve replacement (AVR) before irreversible LV dysfunction has developed. Assessment of long-axis left ventricular (LV) function may assist in proper timing of AVR. OBJECTIVES: To assess serial changes in long-axis LV function before and after AVR in patients with severe AS and preserved LV ejection fraction. METHODS: The study comprised 27 consecutive patients (mean age 64.9 ± 11.7 years, 15 males) with symptomatic severe AS, scheduled for AVR. Seventeen subjects without known cardiac disease, matched for age, gender, LV ejection fraction and cardiovascular risk factors, served as a control group. Long-axis LV function assessment was done with tissue Doppler imaging at 3 weeks, 6 months, and 12 months after AVR. RESULTS: Mean aortic valve area in the AS group was 0.70 ± 0.24 cm². Pre-AVR peak systolic mitral annular velocities were significantly lower compared to controls (6.7 ± 1.5 vs. 8.9 ± 2.0 cm/s, P < 0.05). Post-AVR peak systolic mitral annular velocities improved to 9.1 ± 2.9 at 3 weeks, 8.6 ± 2.7 at 6 months, and 8.1 ± 1.7 cm/s at 12 months (P < 0.05). Improvements were seen over the whole range of pre-AVR peak systolic mitral annular velocities. Patients with improved Sm after AVR (defined as ≥ 10% compared to baseline values) did not differ in baseline characteristics as compared to those who did not improve. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with severe AS and preserved LV ejection fraction, abnormal systolic mitral annular velocities improve after AVR, independent of the pre-AVR value.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Galema et al. (2010) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: