Key result
The AF-QoL questionnaire demonstrated validity and reliability, with AF patients reporting lower mean overall scores (43.6) compared to stable post-myocardial infarction controls (51.7; P<0.05).
Why the study?
Is the AF-QoL a valid and reliable disease-specific quality of life questionnaire for patients with atrial fibrillation?
Observational (n=417)
Yes
Is the AF-QoL a valid and reliable disease-specific quality of life questionnaire for patients with atrial fibrillation?
The AF-QoL is a valid and reliable disease-specific health-related quality of life measure for patients with atrial fibrillation.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support AF-QoL for clinical QoL assessment in AF; extends validation data but leaves broader utility open.
AIMS: To assess the performance of AF-QoL, a quality of life questionnaire for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). METHODS AND RESULTS: Observational, prospective, multicentre study in 29 Spanish centres. Three patients' groups were identified at baseline visit: AF patients receiving a new therapeutic intervention according to physician criteria (intervention group); AF clinically stable patients according to physician evaluation (clinically stable group); and patients in a stable condition for more than 1 year after a myocardial infarction (control group). All patients were > or = 18 years. Follow-up visit was at 1 month (clinically stable group) and 3 +/- 1 months (intervention group). Sociodemographic and clinical information was gathered. AF-QoL, SF-36, and patient self-perception of general health status were administered. A total of 417 patients was included. Mean (SD) age was 61.2 (12.4), 31.4% women. AF-QoL mean overall score in AF patients (43.6) was lower (worse health-related quality of life, HRQoL) than in the control group (51.7) (P < 0.05). At baseline, patients with higher frequency of symptoms (P < 0.05) and worse NYHA functional class (P < 0.01) reported lower AF-QoL scores. AF-QoL and SF-36 correlated in all of their domains (r = 0.14-0.8, P < 0.01). AF-QoL showed good internal consistency (0.92) and test-retest reliability (0.86). CONCLUSION: AF-QoL is a valid and reliable HRQoL measure. Further investigation is recommended before using it in clinical practice.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Arribas et al. (2010) conducted an observational in Atrial fibrillation (n=417). AF-QoL questionnaire vs. Control group (stable >1 year post-myocardial infarction) was evaluated on AF-QoL mean overall score (p=<0.05). The AF-QoL questionnaire demonstrated validity and reliability, with AF patients reporting lower mean overall scores (43.6) compared to stable post-myocardial infarction controls (51.7; P<0.05).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: