Why the study?
Does magnetic resonance imaging affect the function and safety of implantable pulse generators?
Does magnetic resonance imaging affect the function and safety of implantable pulse generators?
Magnetic resonance imaging can induce reed switch closure and potentially dangerous rapid cardiac stimulation in some implantable pulse generators.
Alerts clinicians to potential MRI risks in legacy devices; leaves open translation to modern generators and patients.
The effects of magnetic resonance imaging were assessed on four dual chamber and two single chamber pulse generators. The tests were performed with a resistive, water-cooled magnet operating at 0.15 T. The 6.4-MHz radiofrequency (RF) field was operated at a maximum power of 1,000 watts with a period adjusted from 130 to 500 ms. Reed switch closure occurred in all six pulse generators tested when placed near the entrance of the magnetic resonance imaging scanner, and the generators reverted to asynchronous operation unless programmed to the "magnet off" mode. None of the pulse generators exhibited any alterations in programmed parameters or in the ability to be reprogrammed after RF pulsing. When the RF field was turned on, there was no change in the asynchronous paced cycle length in four pulse generators; however, during RF scanning there was rapid cardiac stimulation at the RF pulse period in one single chamber and one dual chamber pulse generator.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Holmes et al. (1986) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: