Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This essay critiques central clinical and theoretical assumptions in psychoanalysis, suggesting new interpretations.
Donald Spence's book, Meaning and Interpretation in Psychoanalysis, is so disturbing and so revolutionary, in the sense of essaying so radical and fundamental a critique of our most central clinical and theoretical operating assumptions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
McKeown et al. (1983) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: