Key result
Adherence to consensus-based care considerations for Duchenne and Becker muscular dystrophy varied widely, with 84% adherence for cardiologist assessments but only 31% for transition planning.
Observational (n=299)
Yes
Adherence to consensus-based care considerations for Duchenne and Becker muscular dystrophy varies widely across domains, with high adherence for cardiology assessments but insufficiency in other critical areas like transition planning.
Variable adherence signals need for targeted quality improvement beyond cardiology; this Level 3 cohort study leaves open effects on outcomes.
BACKGROUND: Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) is an X-linked disorder characterized by progressive muscle weakness and multisystem involvement. Recent advances in management of individuals with DMD have prolonged survival. Lack of standardized care spurred an international collaboration to develop consensus-based care considerations for diagnosis and management. In this study, we evaluate adherence to considerations at selected sites. METHODS: We collaborated with the Muscular Dystrophy Surveillance, Tracking, and Research Network. Our sample included males with DMD and Becker muscular dystrophy <21 years as of December 31, 2010, with 1 health care encounter on or after January 1, 2012. We collected data from medical records on encounters occurring January 1, 2012, through December 31, 2014. Adherence was determined when frequency of visits or assessments were at or above recommendations for selected care considerations. RESULTS: Our analytic sample included 299 individuals, 7% of whom (20/299) were classified as childhood-onset Becker muscular dystrophy. Adherence for neuromuscular and respiratory clinician visits was 65% for the cohort; neuromuscular assessments and corticosteroid side effect monitoring measures ranged from 16% to 68%. Adherence was 83% for forced vital capacity and ≤58% for other respiratory diagnostics. Cardiologist assessments and echocardiograms were found for at least 84%. Transition planning for education or health care was documented for 31% of eligible males. CONCLUSIONS: Medical records data were used to identify areas in which practice aligns with the care considerations. However, there remains inconsistency across domains and insufficiency in critical areas. More research is needed to explain this variability and identify reliable methods to measure outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Andrews et al. (2018) conducted an observational in Duchenne and Becker muscular dystrophy (n=299). Adherence to consensus-based care considerations was evaluated on Adherence to care considerations (frequency of visits or assessments at or above recommendations). Adherence to consensus-based care considerations for Duchenne and Becker muscular dystrophy varied widely, with 84% adherence for cardiologist assessments but only 31% for transition planning.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: