Key result
An automated intrinsic morphology match score ≥89% perfectly identifies selective His bundle pacing.
Why the study?
Pace mapping and visual comparison form the mainstay of His bundle pacing, prompting evaluation of a surface lead morphology match algorithm for automated classification of the pacing response.
Does automated intrinsic morphology matching accurately classify the pacing response in patients with narrow QRS complexes undergoing His bundle pacing?
Observational (n=28)
No
Does automated intrinsic morphology matching accurately classify the pacing response in patients with narrow QRS complexes undergoing His bundle pacing?
The automated intrinsic morphology match score provides a highly accurate and standardized method to classify pacing responses during electroanatomic mapping-guided His bundle pacing in patients with narrow QRS complexes.
May aid standardized His bundle pacing classification in narrow QRS; leaves open prospective validation before clinical use.
Pace mapping and visual comparison of the local pacing response with the intrinsic QRS morphology form the mainstay of His bundle pacing (HBP). We evaluated the performance of a surface lead morphology match algorithm for automated classification of the pacing response in patients with narrow intrinsic QRS undergoing electroanatomic mapping (EAM)-guided HBP. HBP was attempted in 43 patients. In 28 cases with narrow QRS, the EnSite AutoMap Module was used for automated assessment of the QRS morphology resulting from pace mapping in the His cloud area with either a diagnostic catheter or the His lead. An intrinsic morphology match score (IMS) was calculated for 1.546 QRS complexes and assessed regarding its accuracy and performance in classifying the individual pacing response as either selective HBP (S-HBP), nonselective HBP (NS-HBP) or right ventricular stimulation. Automated morphology comparison of 354 intrinsic beats with the individual reference determined a test accuracy of 99% (95% CI 98.96-99.04) and a precision of 97.99-99.5%. For His-lead stimulation, an IMS ≥ 89% identified S-HBP with a sensitivity, specificity and positive predictive value of 1.00 (0.99, 1.00) and a negative predictive value of 0.99 (0.98, 1.00). An IMS between 78 and < 89% indicated NS-HBP with a sensitivity and specificity of 1.00 (0.99, 1.00) and 0.99 (0.98, 1.00), respectively. IMS represents a new automated measure for standardized individual morphology classification in patients with normal QRS undergoing EAM-guided HBP.Clinical trial registration: NCT04416958.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bastian et al. (2022) conducted an observational in Narrow QRS complexes undergoing His bundle pacing (n=28). Automated intrinsic morphology match score (IMS) vs. Conventional visual comparison criteria was evaluated on Sensitivity of IMS ≥ 89% for identifying selective His bundle pacing during His-lead stimulation (95% CI 0.99-1.00). An automated intrinsic morphology match score ≥ 89% identified selective His bundle pacing with a sensitivity and specificity of 1.00 during His-lead stimulation.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: