Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
To address the limitations of the Social Vulnerability Index (SoVI) in only providing a general overview without pinpointing areas of social vulnerability, a correlational approach paired with a clustering method can be applied. This approach helps in identifying dominant factors and pinpointing socially vulnerable districts or cities in Central Java. The study employs the K-Medoids algorithm, which is advantageous when dealing with outliers in the dataset. Three different distance measures are considered: Euclidean, Manhattan, and Minkowski distances, to identify the optimal clustering of social vulnerability. The evaluation of the best cluster is conducted using the Davies-Bouldin Index, a metric for validating clustering models by averaging the similarity of each cluster to its most similar counterpart. Findings indicate that using the K-Medoids algorithm with Manhattan distance yields the most effective clustering, resulting in two distinct clusters. Cluster 1, comprising 25 districts/cities, is identified as the most vulnerable to natural disasters and challenges in education, demography, economy, and health. Meanwhile, Cluster 2, encompassing 10 districts/cities, includes urban areas with the highest social vulnerability, notably in the proportion of rental housing.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fadlurohman et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: