PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 6, 2023Journal of the American Heart Association50 citationsOpen Access

Application of Magnetocardiography to Screen for Inflammatory Cardiomyopathy and Monitor Treatment Response

View Full Paper
DBDebora BralaTTTharusan ThevathasanSGSimon Grahl

Key Result

Magnetocardiography differentiated cardiomyopathy patients from controls (sensitivity 0.59, specificity 0.95) and detected treatment response within 7 days (vector decrease from 0.10 to 0.07; P=0.010).

Study Design

Type

Observational (n=233)

Structured PICO

Does magnetocardiography accurately diagnose inflammatory cardiomyopathy and detect early treatment response?

P
Population
233 patients (mean age 45 ± 18 years, 45% women), including 209 adults in the primary analysis (66 with inflammatory cardiomyopathy, 17 with cardiac amyloidosis, 35 with other nonischemic cardiomyopathy, 91 without cardiomyopathy), 13 patients with inflammatory cardiomyopathy undergoing immunosuppressive therapy, and 3 independent cohorts (n=23) plus 1 vaccine-related myocarditis patient.
I
Intervention
Magnetocardiography (MCG)
C
Comparator
Patients without cardiomyopathy (for diagnostic screening); baseline values and echocardiography (for treatment response monitoring)
O
Outcome
Diagnostic accuracy of magnetocardiography vector to differentiate cardiomyopathy versus no cardiomyopathy, and ability to reflect treatment responsesurrogate

Magnetocardiography is a promising non-invasive tool for the early diagnosis of inflammatory cardiomyopathy and can detect treatment response to immunosuppressive therapy as early as 7 days.

Main Result

Effect estimate: Sensitivity 0.59, Specificity 0.95

Abstract

Background Inflammatory cardiomyopathy is one of the most common causes of sudden cardiac death in young adults. Diagnosis of inflammatory cardiomyopathy remains challenging, and better monitoring tools are needed. We present magnetocardiography as a method to diagnose myocardial inflammation and monitor treatment response. Methods and Results A total of 233 patients were enrolled, with a mean age of 45 (±18) years, and 105 (45%) were women. The primary analysis included 209 adult subjects, of whom 66 (32%) were diagnosed with inflammatory cardiomyopathy, 17 (8%) were diagnosed with cardiac amyloidosis, and 35 (17%) were diagnosed with other types of nonischemic cardiomyopathy; 91 (44%) did not have cardiomyopathy. The second analysis included 13 patients with inflammatory cardiomyopathy who underwent immunosuppressive therapy after baseline magnetocardiography measurement. Finally, diagnostic accuracy of magnetocardiography was tested in 3 independent cohorts (total n=23) and 1 patient, who developed vaccine‐related myocarditis. First, we identified a magnetocardiography vector to differentiate between patients with cardiomyopathy versus patients without cardiomyopathy (vector of ≥0.051; sensitivity, 0.59; specificity, 0.95; positive predictive value, 93%; and negative predictive value, 64%). All patients with inflammatory cardiomyopathy, including a patient with mRNA vaccine‐related myocarditis, had a magnetocardiography vector ≥0.051. Second, we evaluated the ability of the magnetocardiography vector to reflect treatment response. We observed a decrease of the pathologic magnetocardiography vector toward normal in all 13 patients who were clinically improving under immunosuppressive therapy. Magnetocardiography detected treatment response as early as day 7, whereas echocardiographic detection of treatment response occurred after 1 month. The magnetocardiography vector decreased from 0.10 at baseline to 0.07 within 7 days ( P =0.010) and to 0.03 within 30 days ( P <0.001). After 30 days, left ventricular ejection fraction improved from 42.2% at baseline to 53.8% ( P <0.001). Conclusions Magnetocardiography has the potential to be used for diagnostic screening and to monitor early treatment response. The method is valuable in inflammatory cardiomyopathy, where there is a major unmet need for early diagnosis and monitoring response to immunosuppressive therapy.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Brala et al. (2023) conducted an observational in Inflammatory cardiomyopathy (n=233). Magnetocardiography vs. Patients without cardiomyopathy was evaluated on Differentiation between patients with cardiomyopathy versus patients without cardiomyopathy using a magnetocardiography vector ≥0.051 (Sensitivity 0.59, Specificity 0.95). Magnetocardiography differentiated cardiomyopathy patients from controls (sensitivity 0.59, specificity 0.95) and detected treatment response within 7 days (vector decrease from 0.10 to 0.07; P=0.010).

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a12b5705a4f3a9db9a42521https://doi.org/10.1161/jaha.122.027619
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1In Utero Diagnosis of Long QT Syndrome by Magnetocardiography2013 · 117 citations
  2. 2Idiopathic Giant-Cell Myocarditis — Natural History and Treatment1997 · 760 citations
  3. 3Virome Sequencing in Patients With Myocarditis2020 · 29 citations
  4. 4Current state of knowledge on aetiology, diagnosis, management, and therapy of myocarditis: a position statement of the European Society of Cardiology Working Group on Myocardial and Pericardial Diseases2013 · 3,479 citations
  5. 5Detection of Fetal Arrhythmia by Using Optically Pumped Magnetometers2017 · 34 citations