Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
What makes computer-mediated groups tick and/or stick? To what degree are computer-mediated discussants really sustained “groups”? Does the grouping quality reflect anything beyond technical structure? Are technical structure and grouping related? How do threads define groups, or vice-versa? Does any of this change between academic and commercial networks?
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rafaeli et al. (2006) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: