Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Consider the two-person zero-sum game in which two investors are each allowed to invest in a market with stocks (X 1 , X 2 , …, X m ) ∼ F, where X i ≥ 0. Each investor has one unit of capital. The goal is to achieve more money than one’s opponent. Allowable portfolio strategies are random investment policies B ∈ R m , B ≥ 0, E ∑ m i = 1 B i = 1. The payoff to player 1 for policy B 1 vs. B 2 is P {B t 1 X ≥ B t 2 X}. The optimal policy is shown to be B* = Ub*, where U is a random variable uniformly distributed on [0, 2], and b* maximizes E ln b t X over b ≥ 0, ∑ b i = 1 . Curiously, this competitively optimal investment policy b* is the same policy that achieves the maximum possible growth rate of capital in repeated independent investments (Breiman [Breiman, L. 1961. Optimal gambling systems for favorable games. Fourth Berkeley Symposium. 1 65–78.] and Kelly [Kelly, J. 1956. A new interpretation of information rate. Bell System Tech. J. 917–926.]). Thus the immediate goal of outperforming another investor is perfectly compatible with maximizing the asymptotic rate of return.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bell et al. (1980) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: