Key result
Ultrathin second-generation DES reduces 2-year target lesion failure ~12% versus standard thickness stents.
Why the study?
Ultrathin second-generation DES improve outcomes at 1 year, but their long-term effect beyond 1 year in coronary artery disease remains unknown.
Do ultrathin second-generation drug eluting stents reduce target lesion failure at 2 years in patients with coronary artery disease undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention compared to standard thickness second-generation drug eluting stents?
Meta-Analysis (n=14,649)
Do ultrathin second-generation drug eluting stents reduce target lesion failure at 2 years in patients with coronary artery disease undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention compared to standard thickness second-generation drug eluting stents?
Ultrathin second-generation drug-eluting stents significantly reduce target lesion failure at 2 and 3 years compared to standard thickness stents in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Ultrathin second-generation DES merit preference in PCI to lower TLF; reinforces strut-thickness benefit in meta-analysis of contemporary platforms.
OBJECTIVE: Identify the effect of ultrathin drug eluting stents on long term outcomes in coronary artery disease. BACKGROUND: Although second-generation drug eluting stents (DES) are superior to first-generation DES, persistence of adverse outcomes has led to continued refinement in design. Ultrathin second-generation DES have been shown to improve outcomes at 1-year follow-up. Beyond 1-year their effect remains unknown. METHODS: PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Database were searched for randomized controlled trials that compared ultrathin (defined as <70 um) to standard thickness second-generation DES. Studies were chosen according to the PROSPERO protocol (CRD42020185374). Data from randomized controlled trials were pooled using random-effects model (Mantel-Haenszel). The primary outcome was target lesion failure (TLF) at 2 years, a composite of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction, and ischemia-driven target vessel revascularization. Secondary outcomes included TLF at 3 and 5 years, the components of TLF and definite or probable stent thrombosis. Differences in outcomes between groups were presented in Forest plots as risk ratios (RR) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for each trial. RESULTS: We identified 18 publications from 10 trials with14,649 patients. At 2-years there was a significant 12% reduction in TLF (RR, 0.88; 95% CI 0.78-0.99; p < 0.05) associated with the use of ultrathin DES. At 3-years, there was a significant 19% reduction in TLF with ultrathin DES (RR, 0.79; 95% CI 0.64-0.98; p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: In patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention, ultrathin DES improve long term clinical outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hussain et al. (2021) conducted a meta-analysis in coronary artery disease (n=14,649). Ultrathin second-generation drug eluting stents (<70 um) vs. Standard thickness second-generation drug eluting stents was evaluated on Target lesion failure (TLF) at 2 years, a composite of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction, and ischemia-driven target vessel revascularization (RR 0.88, 95% CI 0.78-0.99, p=< 0.05). Ultrathin second-generation drug eluting stents significantly reduced target lesion failure at 2 years compared to standard thickness stents (RR 0.88; 95% CI 0.78-0.99; p < 0.05).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: