Key result
Supramaximal effort in patients with left ventricular dysfunction showed a similar relative anaerobic vs. aerobic contribution to total energy release compared to normal patients.
Why the study?
Does the relative anaerobic vs. aerobic contribution to total energy release during supramaximal effort differ between patients with left ventricular dysfunction and normal patients?
Observational (n=36)
Does the relative anaerobic vs. aerobic contribution to total energy release during supramaximal effort differ between patients with left ventricular dysfunction and normal patients?
The relative anaerobic and aerobic contributions to total energy release during supramaximal exercise are similar in patients with left ventricular dysfunction and normal individuals, indicating this metabolic interaction is independent of exercise tolerance.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Similar energy partitioning during supramaximal effort in LV dysfunction; hypothesis-generating and should not yet change practice.
Energetic metabolism during effort is impaired in patients with left ventricular dysfunction (Dysf), but data have been lacking up to now on the relative anaerobic vs. aerobic contribution to total energy release during supramaximal effort. Recently, the maximal accumulated oxygen deficit (MAOD) has been shown to be measurable in Dysf patients, making it possible to evaluate the anaerobic/aerobic interaction under conditions of maximal stress of both anaerobic and aerobic metabolic pathways in this population. Nineteen Dysf patients and 17 normal patients (N) underwent one ramp cardiopulmonary, three moderate-intensity constant-power, and three supramaximal constant-power (1- to 2-min, 2- to 3-min, and 3- to 4-min duration) exercise tests. MAOD was the difference between accumulated O(2) demand (accO(2)dem; estimated from the moderate-intensity O(2) uptake/watt relationship) and uptake during supramaximal tests. Percent anaerobic (%Anaer) and aerobic (%Aer) energetic release were [(MAOD/accO(2)dem).100] and 100 - %Anaer, respectively. MAOD did not vary between 1-2, 2-3, and 3-4 min supramaximal tests, whereas accO(2)dem increased significantly with and was linearly related to test duration in both Dysf and N. Consequently, %Anaer and %Aer decreased and increased, respectively, with increasing test duration but did not differ between Dysf and N in 1-2 min, 2-3 min, and 3-4 min tests. Our study demonstrates a similar relative anaerobic vs. aerobic contribution to total energy release during supramaximal effort in Dysf and N. This finding indicates that energetic metabolism during supramaximal exercise is exercise tolerance independent and that relative anaerobic vs. aerobic contribution in this effort domain remains the same within the physiology- or pathology-induced limits to individual peak exercise performance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mezzani et al. (2007) conducted an observational in Left ventricular dysfunction (n=36). Supramaximal constant-power exercise tests vs. Normal patients was evaluated on Relative anaerobic vs. aerobic contribution to total energy release. Supramaximal effort in patients with left ventricular dysfunction showed a similar relative anaerobic vs. aerobic contribution to total energy release compared to normal patients.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: