Key result
Heart failure subjects demonstrated significantly reduced gross (-15%, P=0.019) and work (-35%, P=0.002) biomechanical efficiency during steady-state exercise compared to normal controls.
Why the study?
Is biomechanical efficiency impaired in heart failure subjects compared to normal controls during steady state and ramp exercise?
Observational
Is biomechanical efficiency impaired in heart failure subjects compared to normal controls during steady state and ramp exercise?
Heart failure patients exhibit decreased biomechanical efficiency during both steady-state and ramp exercise, which correlates with symptoms of fatigue and breathlessness.
Impaired efficiency may contribute to HF exercise intolerance; cross-sectional data leaves open causality and therapeutic relevance.
BACKGROUND: Previous studies of biomechanical efficiency (external work/energy input--Watt/O(2) consumed) in heart failure (HF) using cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) and magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) have had discordant results with increased efficiency by CPET and decreased efficiency by MRS. AIMS: Compare biomechanical efficiency of HF subjects and normal controls during steady state (SS=35 W for 6 min) and ramp cycle ergometer exercise. The hypothesis was that HF subjects would have impaired biomechanical efficiency that correlated with HF symptoms. METHODS: Biomechanical efficiency used the actual Vo(2) during exercise and recovery. Gross (Vo(2) above zero), Net (Vo(2) above the resting Vo(2)) and Work (Vo(2) above the unloaded pedaling Vo(2)) efficiencies were calculated. RESULTS: HF subjects had an 18% higher Vo(2) during SS exercise (P=0.029). Biomechanical efficiency was reduced during SS exercise (gross -15%, P=0.019, net -15%, P=0.062, and work -35%, P=0.002). Gross Efficiency during SS exercise had the strongest correlation with HF symptoms (r=0.55). During ramp exercise gross (-26%), net (-10%) and work (-8%) biomechanical efficiency were all reduced (all P<0.05). The slope of the Vo(2)/Watt relationship during ramp exercise had the best correlation with HF symptoms (r=0.46). CONCLUSIONS: HF subjects have an increased O(2) cost/Watt during SS and ramp exercise that correlates with HF symptoms of fatigue and breathlessness. Methods to improve biomechanical efficiency in HF subjects by exercise training or medications may improve the symptoms and the impaired exercise capacity associated with HF.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Levy et al. (2004) conducted an observational in Heart failure. Steady state and ramp cycle ergometer exercise vs. Normal controls was evaluated on Biomechanical efficiency (gross, net, and work) (-15% (gross), p=0.019). Heart failure subjects demonstrated significantly reduced gross (-15%, P=0.019) and work (-35%, P=0.002) biomechanical efficiency during steady-state exercise compared to normal controls.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:
More on HFrEF treatmentMore from European Journal of Heart Failure