Key result
PCSK9 inhibitors show no disproportionate reporting signal for hypersensitivity or anaphylaxis in the FAERS database.
Why the study?
Recent case reports linked PCSK9 inhibitor use to severe hypersensitivity reactions, prompting an assessment of disproportionate reporting of hypersensitivity or anaphylaxis.
Does the use of PCSK9 inhibitors increase the reporting of hypersensitivity or anaphylaxis compared to other drugs in the FAERS database?
Observational (n=29,805)
Does the use of PCSK9 inhibitors increase the reporting of hypersensitivity or anaphylaxis compared to other drugs in the FAERS database?
Effect estimate: ROR 0.68 (95% CI 0.67-0.69)
This large pharmacovigilance study found no consistent safety signal for hypersensitivity or anaphylaxis with the use of PCSK9 inhibitors overall.
No hypersensitivity signal supports continued PCSK9 inhibitor use; observational data leaves open need for prospective confirmation.
Recent case reports linked use of the lipid-lowering class of proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors to severe hypersensitivity reactions. Therefore, our pharmacovigilance study assessed the association between reporting of PCSK9 inhibitors and hypersensitivity or anaphylaxis. We analyzed the US Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) extracting spontaneous reports from 2015 to 2023. We calculated reporting odds ratios (ROR), proportional reporting ratios, and information components (IC) as measures of disproportionate reporting of hypersensitivity or anaphylaxis with PCSK9 inhibitors overall and with specific compounds (alirocumab, evolocumab) using the entire FAERS as comparator. In sensitivity analyses, we adjusted for demographic characteristics, used statins as active comparator, and applied alternate outcome definitions. Among all reports in FAERS during the study period involving PCSK9 inhibitors, we identified 12,591 cases of hypersensitivity and 17,214 cases of anaphylaxis. Across disproportionality analysis methods, we did not observe an association between the reporting of PCSK9 inhibitors or evolocumab specifically and the outcomes. However, there were associations with alirocumab and hypersensitivity (ROR, 1.14; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.11-1.18 / IC, 0.19; 95% credible interval [CrI], 0.14-0.24) and with alirocumab and anaphylaxis (ROR, 1.30; 95% CI, 1.26-1.33; IC, 0.37; 95% CrI, 0.33-0.42). Sensitivity analyses corroborated the lack of an association with PCSK9 inhibitors or with evolocumab and were inconsistent regarding alirocumab. Our large pharmacovigilance study showed no signal of disproportionate reporting for hypersensitivity or anaphylaxis with PCSK9 inhibitors overall. The inconsistencies in alirocumab related findings argue against a compound specific signal.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dermiki‐Gkana et al. (2025) conducted an observational in Adverse events in patients using PCSK9 inhibitors (n=29,805). PCSK9 inhibitors (alirocumab, evolocumab) vs. Entire FAERS database was evaluated on Disproportionate reporting of hypersensitivity (ROR 0.68, 95% CI 0.67-0.69). PCSK9 inhibitors overall showed no signal of disproportionate reporting for hypersensitivity (ROR 0.68) or anaphylaxis compared to the entire FAERS database.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: