Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This article, which focuses on the macro-dynamic branches of defense economics, aims at showing that the mainstream literature – the neoclassical school or the methodologies closely related to it – devoted to the effects of military spending stumbles over worrying difficulties, by throwing light on its insuperable theoretical and empirical limitations. The authors’ criticism applies to: demand-side and supply-side models (first part); formalizations with technological spin-off effects, externalities or public goods (second part); and simulation models, including the most recent ones with endogenous technical progress growth models (third part).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Herrera et al. (2013) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: