Key result
Inferior vena cava filter insertion provided very limited benefit in patients with advanced-stage cancer, with a median survival of only 1.31 months among those with stage IV disease.
Why the study?
Does IVC filter insertion provide clinical benefit in patients with advanced-stage cancer?
Observational (n=107)
No
Does IVC filter insertion provide clinical benefit in patients with advanced-stage cancer?
IVC filters offer very limited benefit in patients with advanced-stage cancer due to extremely short life expectancy, suggesting placement should be carefully weighed against prognosis.
Short survival after IVC filter placement in advanced cancer warrants cautious selection; leaves open prospective trials to define any benefit.
BACKGROUND: Cancer and its treatment are recognized risk factors for venous thromboembolism (VTE). Inferior vena cava (IVC) filters are utilized to provide mechanical thromboprophylaxis to prevent pulmonary embolism (PE) or to avoid bleeding from systemic anticoagulation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 107 cancer patients who had IVC filters inserted and followed up at our institution was performed. All patients had active cancer; a majority (> 90%) had advanced-stage disease, whereas only five patients (5.8%) had stages I or II disease. RESULTS: Eighty six patients (80.3%) had their IVC filter placed through a jugular approach. Filter insertion was not without complications; recurrent deep vein thrombosis (DVT) was reported in 10 (9.3%), PE in three (2.8%) and filter thrombosis in one patient. The value of IVC filter in patients with advanced stage disease was very limited: among 59 patients with stage IV disease for whom survival data was available, the median survival was only 1.31 months (0.92-2.20) with 23 patients (39.0%) surviving less than a month, and 40 (67.8%) surviving less than three months. CONCLUSIONS: Systemic anticoagulation can be safely offered for the majority of cancer patients. When the risk of bleeding or PE is high, IVC filters can be utilized. However, the placement of such filters should take into consideration the stage of disease and life expectancy of such patients. Patients with advanced-stage disease may gain little benefit from IVC filter insertion.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mansour et al. (2014) conducted an observational in Advanced-stage cancer (n=107). Inferior vena cava (IVC) filters was evaluated on Median survival in patients with stage IV disease (95% CI 0.92-2.20). Inferior vena cava filter insertion provided very limited benefit in patients with advanced-stage cancer, with a median survival of only 1.31 months among those with stage IV disease.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: