Key result
Perioperative interruption of DOACs was associated with significantly lower 30-day postoperative major bleeding rates compared to VKAs (0.57% vs 3.62%).
Why the study?
There was a paucity of studies comparing postoperative thromboembolic and major bleeding complications following perioperative interruption of DOACs versus VKAs.
Does perioperative interruption of DOACs compared to VKAs reduce postoperative major bleeding or thromboembolic events in patients with atrial fibrillation?
Population
325 DOAC patients (351 procedures) and 199 VKA patients (221 procedures) with AF
Comparison
Perioperative interruption of DOACs vs VKAs
Design
Retrospective cohort study
Follow-up
30-day
Authors
Loading...
May favor DOAC over VKA interruption perioperatively in AF; leaves open randomized validation of net benefit.
Cohort (n=524)
Does perioperative interruption of DOACs compared to VKAs reduce postoperative major bleeding or thromboembolic events in patients with atrial fibrillation?
Absolute Event Rate: 0.57% vs 3.62%
Perioperative interruption of VKAs is associated with higher postoperative major bleeding rates compared to DOACs in patients with atrial fibrillation.
Shaw et al. (2020) conducted a cohort in Atrial fibrillation (n=524). Perioperative interruption of DOACs vs. Perioperative interruption of VKAs was evaluated on 30-day postoperative major bleeding. Perioperative interruption of DOACs was associated with significantly lower 30-day postoperative major bleeding rates compared to VKAs (0.57% vs 3.62%).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: