Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Although learners are being connected 1:1 with instructors at an increasing scale, most of these instructors do not receive effective, consistent feedback to help them improve. We deployed M-Powering Teachers, an automated tool based on natural language processing to give instructors feedback on dialogic instructional practices ---including their uptake of student contributions, talk time and questioning practices --- in a 1:1 online learning context. We conducted a randomized controlled trial on Polygence, a research mentorship platform for high schoolers (n=414 mentors) to evaluate the effectiveness of the feedback tool. We find that the intervention improved mentors' uptake of student contributions by 10%, reduced their talk time by 5% and improved student's experience with the program as well as their relative optimism about their academic future. These results corroborate existing evidence that scalable and low-cost automated feedback can improve instruction and learning in online educational contexts.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Demszky et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: