Key result
Life's Essential 8 score of 40 versus 80 linked to ~15-fold more poor self-rated health.
Why the study?
Following the American Heart Association update from Life's Simple 7 to Life's Essential 8, their associations and discriminatory capacity regarding self-rated health and health-related quality of life remained to be analyzed.
Does a higher Life's Essential 8 score improve self-rated health and health-related quality of life in middle-aged Swedish adults?
Cross-Sectional (n=28,731)
Yes
Does a higher Life's Essential 8 score improve self-rated health and health-related quality of life in middle-aged Swedish adults?
Effect estimate: OR 14.8 (95% CI 13.0-17.0)
The novel Life's Essential 8 cardiovascular health score is strongly associated with self-rated health and health-related quality of life, demonstrating slightly better discrimination capacity than the previous Life's Simple 7 score.
LE8-SRH association should not yet change practice; leaves open prospective HRQoL benefits versus LS7.
PURPOSE: To monitor cardiovascular health, in 2022, the American Heart Association (AHA) updated the construct "Life's Simple 7" (LS7) to "Life's Essential 8" (LE8). This study aims to analyze the associations and capacity of discrimination of LE8 and LS7 in relation to self-rated health (SRH) and health-related quality of life (HRQoL). METHODS: This study from the Swedish CArdioPulmonary bioImage Study (SCAPIS) included 28 731 Swedish participants, aged 50-64 years. Three different scores were derived from the SF-12 questionnaire: 1-item question SRH ("In general, would you say your health is …?"), mental-HRQoL and physical-HRQoL. Logistic regression, restricted cubic splines, and ROC analysis were used to study the associations between the AHA scores in relation to SRH and HRQoL. RESULTS: Compared to those with a LE8 score of 80, participants with a LE8 score of 40 were 14.8 times more likely to report poor SRH (OR: 14.8, 95% CI: 13.0-17.0), after adjustments. Moreover, they were more likely to report a poor mental-HRQoL (OR: 4.9, 95% CI: 4.2-5.6) and a poor physical-HRQoL (OR: 8.0, 95% CI: 7.0-9.3). Area under curves for discriminating poor SRH were 0.696 (95% CI: 0.687-0.704), 0.666 (95% CI: 0.657-0.674), and 0.643 (95% CI: 0.634-0.651) for LE8, LS7 (0-14), and LS7 (0-7), respectively, all p values < 0.001 in the DeLong's tests. CONCLUSION: LE8 and LS7 had strong and inverse associations with SRH, mental-HRQoL, and physical-HRQoL, though LE8 had a somewhat higher capacity of discrimination than LS7. The novel LE8, a construct initially conceived to monitor cardiovascular health, also conveys SRH and HRQoL.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Herráiz-Adillo et al. (2024) conducted a cross-sectional in General population (n=28,731). Life's Essential 8 (LE8) score of 40 vs. Life's Essential 8 (LE8) score of 80 was evaluated on Poor self-rated health (SRH) (OR 14.8, 95% CI 13.0-17.0). Participants with a Life's Essential 8 score of 40 were 14.8 times more likely to report poor self-rated health compared to those with a score of 80.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: