Key result
Cheyne-Stokes respiration linked to ~127% higher odds of poor discharge outcomes in neurocritical patients.
Why the study?
Cheyne-Stokes respiration is frequent in critically ill patients and linked to poor prognosis, but had not been evaluated in neurocritical patients.
Does the presence of Cheyne-Stokes respiration predict poor clinical outcomes in neurocritical patients?
Cohort (n=406)
No
Does the presence of Cheyne-Stokes respiration predict poor clinical outcomes in neurocritical patients?
Cheyne-Stokes respiration is highly prevalent (40.9%) in neurocritical care patients and serves as an independent predictor of poor functional outcome at discharge.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May identify higher-risk neurocritical patients; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation before guiding care.
Address for correspondence Tae-Joon Kim, MD Department of Neurology, Ajou University School of Medicine, 164 World cup-ro, Yeongtong-gu, Suwon 16499, Korea Tel: +82-31-219-5090 Fax: +82-31-219-5178 E-mail: tjkim23@ajou.ac. Objectives: Cheyne-Stokes respiration (CSR) is frequently found in critically ill patients and is associated with poor prognosis. However, CSR has not been evaluated in neurocritical patients. This study investigated the frequency and prognostic impact of CSR in neurocritical patients using biosignal big data obtained from intensive care units. Methods: This study included all patients who received neurocritical care at the tertiary hospital from January 2018 to December 2019. Clinical information and biosignal data of intensive care units were used and analyzed. The respiratory curve was visually assessed to determine whether CSR and obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) were present, and a heart rate variability (HRV) was obtained from the electrocardiogram. Results: CSR was confirmed in 166 of 406 patients (40.9%). Patients with CSR were older, had a higher frequency of cardiovascular risk factors as well as heart failure, and had a poor outcome (modified Rankin scale ≥4). As a result of multiple regression analysis adjusted for other variables, CSR was significantly associated with poor outcome with an odds ratio of 2.27 times higher (95% confidence interval 1.25–4.14, p=0.007). HRV analysis demonstrated that CSR and OSA had distinct autonomic characteristics. Conclusions: This study first revealed the substantial frequency of CSR in neurocritical patients and suggests that it can be used as a predictor of poor prognosis in neurocritical care. J Sleep Med 2020;17(1):84-92
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kim et al. (2020) conducted a cohort in Neurocritical illness (n=406). Cheyne-Stokes respiration (CSR) vs. No Cheyne-Stokes respiration was evaluated on Poor outcome (modified Rankin scale ≥4 at discharge) (OR 2.27, 95% CI 1.25-4.14, p=0.007). Cheyne-Stokes respiration was significantly associated with a poor outcome (modified Rankin scale ≥4) at discharge in neurocritical patients, with an adjusted odds ratio of 2.27.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: