Key result
Cheyne-Stokes respiration in CHF links to a ~21-second longer lung-to-artery circulation time.
Why the study?
What are the circulatory, chemical, and ventilatory response factors driving Cheyne-Stokes respiration in patients with heart disease?
Observational (n=32)
What are the circulatory, chemical, and ventilatory response factors driving Cheyne-Stokes respiration in patients with heart disease?
Absolute Event Rate: 29% vs 8%
Prolonged circulation time is a primary driver of Cheyne-Stokes respiration in heart failure, which can be accurately modeled mathematically.
Prolonged circulation time may drive CSR in HF; leaves open whether targeting it alters ventilatory stability or outcomes in trials.
Circulatory, chemical, and ventilatory response factors in Cheyne-Stokes respiration (CSR) were studied by experimental procedures and by mathematical analysis. Hemodynamic, ventilatory, and blood gas patterns in 16 patients with heart disease and CSR (group A) and 16 patients with congestive heart failure (CHF) without CSR (group B) were compared. CO 2 and oxygen were administered to group A. The phenomena exhibited by patients with CSR were simulated by a mathematical model. The following conclusions were drawn: (1) Reduced blood flow and respiratory alkalosis were similar in both groups; (2) circulation times, lung to artery, were 29 sec greater than normal in patients with CSR but only 8 sec greater than normal in group B patients; (3) the abnormal CO 2 response in CSR, a reduction in threshold and sensitivity, was similar to that in CHF, suggesting that abnormal respiratory mechanics were responsible; (4) mathematical simulation of CSR was possible by appropriate prolongation of circulation time alone; the CO 2 response (reduction in threshold and sensitivity) had no significant effect on stability; (5) damping of oscillatory ventilation by CO 2 inhalation could be efficiently simulated; (6) CSR with cycle periods less than 50 sec suggests increased neural or chemoreceptor excitability, anemia, or hypoxemia as contributory factors, whereas longer periods suggest primary circulatory factors.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lange et al. (1968) conducted an observational in Heart disease with Cheyne-Stokes respiration (CSR) and congestive heart failure (CHF) (n=32). Cheyne-Stokes respiration (CSR) vs. Congestive heart failure without CSR was evaluated on Lung-to-artery circulation time increase from normal (seconds). Patients with Cheyne-Stokes respiration had lung-to-artery circulation times 29 seconds greater than normal, compared to 8 seconds greater than normal in patients with CHF without CSR.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: