Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Theoretical analysis reveals that deterministic barriers to a global democratic polity lack compelling evidence, indicating that global democracy remains possible despite being unlikely.
Scepticism about the possibility of a democratically governed global polity is often rooted in beliefs about ‘necessary conditions’. Some democracy scholars consider a transition to global democracy to be incompatible with necessary conditions for democratic governance, while some International Relations scholars consider it to be incompatible with necessary conditions for international structural change. This article assesses hypotheses and evidence about democratic transitions within states and transformations in the interaction among states and concludes that arguments based on necessary conditions are not compelling. This suggests that global democracy may be unlikely but it is not impossible.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mathias Koenig‐Archibugi (2010) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: