Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Background: The World Health Organization (WHO) defined low-level viremia (LLV) as a viral load (VL) of 51–999 copies/mL, and LLV has been associated with an increased risk of virological failure and drug resistance. Limited information is available from low- and mid-income countries (LMICs), which predominantly use WHO guidelines in HIV program monitoring. We estimated pooled prevalence of LLV, non-viral load suppression (VLS), and association between LLV and non-VLS among people living with HIV in LMICs. Materials and methods: In this systematic review and meta-analysis, databases were searched for articles reporting the association between LLV and non-VLS in LMICs between January 2015 and December 2023. Participants with VL ≤50 copies/mL were considered fully suppressed and those with VL ≥1000 copies/mL were non-suppressed. Using random effects models, we computed the pooled prevalence of LLV, non-VLS, and their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs). We compared pooled prevalence of LLV and non-VLS between children vs adults and between studies done in Africa vs Asia. Results: Sixteen studies with 1 159 317 people living with HIV were analyzed. Overall, pooled prevalence of LLV was 19.7% (95% CI: 15.8–23.6) and that of non-VLS was 8.6% (95% CI: 6.5–10.7). Prevalence of LLV was significantly higher among children compared to adults (25.8% vs 17.2%; P < 0.001) and higher among studies done in Africa compared to those in Asia (22.3% vs 15.6%; P < 0.001). Prevalence of non-VLS was higher among studies involving children compared to adults (17.7% vs 5.6%; P < 0.001), but lower among studies done in Africa compared to Asia 8.3% vs 9.0%; P < 0.001). Overall, LLV increased the risk of non-VLS on a subsequent VL test compared to fully suppressed (RR = 2.6; 95% CI: 2.2–3.1). Conclusions: LLV was associated with an increased risk of non-VLS. Stakeholders should consider reviewing guidelines for the threshold of VLS given that LLV was consistently associated with increased risk of non-VLS across all groups.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mbishi et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: