Key result
Nifedipine and verapamil attenuate ischemia-reperfusion arrhythmias in rats, an effect abolished by probenecid and DPCPX.
Why the study?
Severe and fatal arrhythmias induced by cardiac ischemia/reperfusion complicate acute myocardial infarction, but the underlying molecular mechanisms remain poorly understood.
Does pharmacological modulation with nifedipine or verapamil reduce severe arrhythmias in a rat model of cardiac ischemia/reperfusion?
Does pharmacological modulation with nifedipine or verapamil reduce severe arrhythmias in a rat model of cardiac ischemia/reperfusion?
Pharmacological modulation of Ca2+/cAMP/adenosine signaling via L-type Ca2+ channel blockade and A1 receptor activation attenuates severe arrhythmias in a rat model of myocardial infarction.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Hypothesis-generating for adenosine pathways in Ca2+ blocker antiarrhythmia; leaves open human translation.
Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is the main cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide and is characterized by severe and fatal arrhythmias induced by cardiac ischemia/reperfusion (CIR). However, the molecular mechanisms involved in these arrhythmias are still little understood. To investigate the cardioprotective role of the cardiac Ca2+/cAMP/adenosine signaling pathway in AMI, L-type Ca2+ channels (LTCC) were blocked with either nifedipine (NIF) or verapamil (VER), with or without A1-adenosine (ADO), receptors (A1R), antagonist (DPCPX), or cAMP efflux blocker probenecid (PROB), and the incidence of ventricular arrhythmias (VA), atrioventricular block (AVB), and lethality (LET) induced by CIR in rats was evaluated. VA, AVB and LET incidences were evaluated by ECG analysis and compared between control (CIR group) and intravenously treated 5 min before CIR with NIF 1, 10, and 30 mg/kg and VER 1 mg/kg in the presence or absence of PROB 100 mg/kg or DPCPX 100 µg/kg. The serum levels of cardiac injury biomarkers total creatine kinase (CK) and CK-MB were quantified. Both NIF and VER treatment were able to attenuate cardiac arrhythmias caused by CIR; however, these antiarrhythmic effects were abolished by pretreatment with PROB and DPCPX. The total serum CK and CK-MB were similar in all groups. These results indicate that the pharmacological modulation of Ca2+/cAMP/ADO in cardiac cells by means of attenuation of Ca2+ influx via LTCC and the activation of A1R by endogenous ADO could be a promising therapeutic strategy to reduce the incidence of severe and fatal arrhythmias caused by AMI in humans.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tallo et al. (2023) studied Acute myocardial infarction and cardiac ischemia/reperfusion-induced arrhythmias. Nifedipine (NIF) or Verapamil (VER) with or without Probenecid (PROB) or DPCPX vs. Control (CIR group) was evaluated on Incidence of ventricular arrhythmias (VA), atrioventricular block (AVB), and lethality (LET). Nifedipine and verapamil attenuated cardiac arrhythmias caused by cardiac ischemia/reperfusion in rats, but these antiarrhythmic effects were abolished by pretreatment with probenecid and DPCPX.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: