Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Background: Cinematic-virtual reality (cine-VR) has demonstrated improvements in cultural self-efficacy, diabetes attitudes, and empathy among healthcare providers, but its impact on health professional students is unknown. The purpose of the single-arm pre-post study was to examine the feasibility of this cine-VR diabetes training program as well as to assess changes in cultural self-efficacy, diabetes attitudes, and empathy among health professional students. Method: Participants viewed 12 cine-VR 12 simulations about a 72-year-old patient with type 2 diabetes. Pre-training and post-training, they completed the Transcultural Self-Efficacy Tool, Diabetes Attitude Scale-3, and Jefferson Scale of Empathy. Results: All 92 participants completed the full training. No participants reported technological difficulties or adverse events. For the assessment, 66 participants completed the pre-post measures for a response rate of 71.7% (mean age = 21.1 ± 1.9 years, 82.6% [n = 57] women; 84.1% [n = 58] white). We observed positive improvements in all three cultural self-efficacy subscales: “Cognitive” ( t value = −4.705, P < .001), “Practical” (mean change = −.99, t value = −4.240, P < .001), and “Affective” ( t value = −2.763, P = .008). Similarly, we observed positive improvements in four of the five diabetes attitude subscales: “Need for special training” ( Z = −4.281, P < .001), “Seriousness of type 2 diabetes” ( Z = −3.951, P < .001), “Value of tight glucose control” ( Z = −1.676, P = .094), “Psychosocial impact of diabetes” ( Z = −5.892, P < .001), and “Attitude toward patient autonomy” ( Z = −2.889, P = .005). Finally, we observed a positive improvement in empathy ( t value = −5.151, P < .001). Conclusions: Findings suggest that the cine-VR diabetes training program has the potential to improve cultural self-efficacy, diabetes attitudes, and empathy among health professional students. A randomized controlled trial is needed to confirm its effectiveness.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
McCalla et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: