Key result
Combined septal myectomy and edge-to-edge MV repair cuts LVOT gradient ~80% while resolving MR and SAM.
Why the study?
Concomitant mitral valve surgery is considered during septal myectomy for SAM with residual LVOT obstruction or MR, but the optimal approach remains debated.
Does combined septal myectomy and edge-to-edge mitral valve repair improve echocardiographic parameters and clinical outcomes in patients with obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy?
Systematic Review (n=158)
Does combined septal myectomy and edge-to-edge mitral valve repair improve echocardiographic parameters and clinical outcomes in patients with obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy?
Combined septal myectomy and edge-to-edge mitral valve repair effectively reduces LVOT gradient, systolic anterior motion, and mitral regurgitation with acceptable safety in patients with obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.
Supports combined septal myectomy and edge-to-edge repair in obstructive HCM with SAM/MR; extends single-center data via pooled efficacy and safety.
Left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) obstruction and systolic anterior motion (SAM) of the mitral valve (MV) occurs in 70% of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) patients. In individuals undergoing septal myectomy, concomitant MV surgery is considered for SAM with residual LVOT obstruction or mitral regurgitation (MR); however, the optimal approach remains debated. A literature search was performed in Pubmed, EMBASE, Ovid, and the Cochrane library of published articles through June 2021 reporting on combined septal myectomy and edge-to-edge MV repair for obstructive HCM. Continuous variables were weighted and compared using a student’s t-test, and categorical variables using a chi-square test with Yates correction. Six studies with 158 total patients were included. The mean follow-up was 2.8 ± 2.7 years. Compared with pre-operative values, there were significant reductions in the LV ejection fraction (69 ± 10 vs 59 ± 8%), peak LVOT gradient (82 ± 34 vs 16 ± 13 mmHg), prevalence of moderate or greater MR (84 vs 5 %), and presence of SAM (96% vs 0) (p < 0.001 for all). There was no change in LV internal diastolic diameter (4.2 ± 1.3 vs 4.4 ± 1.5 cm, p = 0.32). There were 2 (1%) operative mortalities. At follow-up, the survival rate was 97%, there were 3 (2%) re-operative MV replacements, 4 (3%) patients remained in New York Heart Association functional class III/IV, and 8 (6%) required permanent pacemaker implantation. In conclusion, combined septal myectomy and edge-to-edge MV repair is a safe and effective treatment strategy in carefully selected patients requiring surgical HCM management.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mihos et al. (2021) conducted a systematic review in obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (n=158). combined septal myectomy and edge-to-edge MV repair vs. pre-operative values was evaluated on peak LVOT gradient (mmHg) (p=<0.001). Combined septal myectomy and edge-to-edge MV repair significantly reduced peak LVOT gradient (82 to 16 mmHg), moderate or greater MR (84% to 5%), and SAM (96% to 0%) (p<0.001 for all).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: