Key result
Abnormal exercise testing parameters including lower peak VO2 and higher VE/VCO2 predict worse HCM outcomes.
Why the study?
The role of exercise testing for prognostic stratification in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy is still not established.
Does exercise testing predict adverse clinical outcomes in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy?
Systematic Review (n=7,525)
Does exercise testing predict adverse clinical outcomes in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy?
Exercise testing parameters, such as peak VO2, VE/VCO2, and abnormal hemodynamic responses, are useful prognostic markers in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, though their independent value over current risk stratification requires further study.
Supports incorporating exercise parameters into HCM prognostication; confirms predictive value while leaving incremental benefit over current models open.
BACKGROUND: Cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET) is indicated as part of the assessment in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) patients and stress echocardiography is often used to assess symptoms. However, the role of exercise testing for prognostic stratification in HCM is still not established. AIMS: To systematically review the evidence on the role of exercise testing for prognostic stratification in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted for eligible publications, between 2010 and 2020, that included evaluation of outcomes and prognosis. In these studies, patients underwent exercise echocardiography and/or cardiopulmonary exercise testing, performed according to predefined protocols. Diverse parameters were assessed in order to determine which were relevant for the prognosis. Analyzed outcomes included death from any cause, sudden cardiac death (SCD) and equivalents, cardiovascular death, heart failure requiring hospitalization or progression to New York Heart Association classes III or IV, cardiac transplantation, non-sustained ventricular tachycardia, stroke, myocardial infarction and invasive septal reduction therapy. RESULTS: Eighteen publications were included, corresponding to a total of 7525 patients. The mean follow-up period varied between 1 and 8 years. The main findings of these studies revealed that the major predictors of outcomes were abnormal heart rate recovery, abnormal blood pressure response exercise induced wall motion abnormalities, lower peak VO2, higher VE/VCO2, and pulmonary hypertension/exercise-induced pulmonary hypertension. CONCLUSION: Although most studies concluded that exercise test results are useful to determine prognosis in HCM, further investigation is needed regarding whether it adds independent value to the current risk stratification strategies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rodrigues et al. (2021) conducted a systematic review in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (n=7,525). Exercise testing (exercise echocardiography and/or cardiopulmonary exercise testing) was evaluated on Death from any cause, sudden cardiac death and equivalents, cardiovascular death, heart failure requiring hospitalization or progression to NYHA III/IV, cardiac transplantation, NSVT, stroke, MI, septal reduction. Exercise testing parameters, including abnormal heart rate recovery, abnormal blood pressure response, lower peak VO2, and higher VE/VCO2, were identified as major predictors of outcomes in HCM.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: