Key result
Technology-based cardiac rehabilitation improves exercise capacity by ~77m versus control.
Why the study?
Although artificial intelligence has been used to design exercise training programs for patients with CAD, few studies have evaluated the effectiveness of technology-based cardiac rehabilitation programs.
Does a technology-based cardiac rehabilitation program improve exercise capacity and adherence in patients with coronary artery disease?
RCT (n=52)
Does a technology-based cardiac rehabilitation program improve exercise capacity and adherence in patients with coronary artery disease?
p-value: p=0.001
Technology-based cardiac rehabilitation programs significantly improve exercise capacity and adherence in patients with coronary artery disease compared to standard physical activity recommendations.
Background Exercise training programs improve exercise capacity and quality of life (QoL) in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). Although artificial intelligence (AI) has been used to design such programs, there are still few studies evaluating their effectiveness. Objectives This study compared the effects of technology-based and traditional programs for cardiac rehabilitation (CR) on exercise capacity and participation in patients with CAD using AI for data analysis. Methods A total of 52 patients with CAD were randomly assigned to three groups: i) telerehabilitation group (TRG) (n=18); ii) mobile application group (MAG) (n=13); and iii) control group (CG), which received only physical activity recommendations (n=21). TRG and MAG participants completed a 12-week program with calisthenic and resistance exercises three times a week. Exercise capacity was assessed using the Incremental Shuttle Walk Test (ISWT), and QoL was measured with the Short Form-36 (SF-36). Patient feedback was analyzed using a fine-tuned BERT-based natural language processing (NLP) model. Anomaly detection methods were applied to find mismatches between self-reported adherence and ISWT results. Statistical significance was set at p<0.05. Results Both TRG [44.4% female] (Δ=87.2±15.2 m) and MAG [50% female] (Δ=89.4±70.4 m) had significant ISWT improvements compared to CG [47.6% female] (Δ=10.9±28.2 m) (p=0.001). Adherence was higher in TRG (100%) and MAG (80%) than in CG (30%) (p<0.001). Patient-reported satisfaction, analyzed via NLP, showed a significant positive correlation with ISWT improvements (r=0.75, p<0.001). Findings show the potential of AI to support outcome assessment in CR. Conclusions Technology-based CR programs improve exercise capacity and adherence in patients with CAD, supporting the use of AI-driven tools. NLP analysis helped link patient feedback to exercise outcomes and detect inconsistencies, showing its value in enhancing CR evaluation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Saklıca et al. (2025) conducted an RCT in Coronary artery disease (n=52). Technology-based cardiac rehabilitation (telerehabilitation or mobile application) vs. Physical activity recommendations only was evaluated on Exercise capacity assessed using the Incremental Shuttle Walk Test (ISWT) (p=0.001). Technology-based cardiac rehabilitation via telerehabilitation or mobile app significantly improved exercise capacity compared to control (Δ=87.2m and Δ=89.4m vs Δ=10.9m; p=0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: