Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
The paper presents a comparative performance study of the two main classes of randomized binary consensus protocols: a local coin protocol, with an expected high communication complexity and cheap symmetric cryptography, and a shared coin protocol, with an expected low communication complexity and expensive asymmetric cryptography. The experimental evaluation was conducted on a LAN environment, by varying several system parameters, such as the fault types and number of processes. The analysis shows that there is a significant gap between the theoretical and the practical performance results of these protocols, and provides an important insight into what actually happens during their execution
Moniz et al. (Sun,) studied this question.